<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD with OASIS Tables with MathML3 v1.4 20241031//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/archiving/1.4/JATS-archive-oasis-article1-4-mathml3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" dtd-version="1.4" article-type="research-article" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Новый юридический журнал</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">3034-4395</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">3034-4395</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-categories><subj-group><subject>Other</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="ru">Перспективы развития российского законодательства о конституционном праве частной собственности</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Prospects for the development of Russian legislation on the constitutional right of private property</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Шумилов</surname><given-names>Ю.И.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/><email>mail@law-books.ru</email></contrib><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">кандидат юридических наук</institution></aff></aff-alternatives></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="epub" iso-8601-date="2023-03-31"><day>31</day><month>03</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><issue>1</issue><fpage>28</fpage><lpage>34</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2023-01-03"><day>03</day><month>01</month><year>2023</year></date><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2023-03-29"><day>29</day><month>03</month><year>2023</year></date></history><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="perspektivy-razvitiya-rossiyskogo-zakonodatelstva-o-konstitutsionnom-prave-chastnoy.pdf" xlink:title="PDF"/><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>В правовом регулировании постсоветской институциональной политики в сфере государственной собственности в Российской Федерации и ее субъектах имеется целый комплекс проблем, требующих обстоятельных научных исследований и практического разрешения. Выявление, обобщение и научный анализ закономерностей развития этого института в новых политико-правовых и социально-экономических условиях актуальны не только с теоретической, но и с практической точек зрения, о чем свидетельствует изучение опыта правового регулирования отношений, связанных с трансформацией государственной собственности в субъектах Российской Федерации.</p></abstract><abstract xml:lang="en" abstract-type="summary"><p>In the legal regulation of post-Soviet institutional policy in the field of state property in the Russian Federation and its constituent entities, there is a whole range of problems that require detailed scientific research and practical resolution. The identification, generalization and scientific analysis of the laws of the development of this institution in new political, legal and socio-economic conditions are relevant not only from a theoretical, but also from a practical point of view, as evidenced by the study of the experience of legal regulation of relations related to the transformation of state property in the constituent entities of the Russian Federation.</p></abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>государственная собственность</kwd><kwd>право частной собственности</kwd><kwd>владение</kwd><kwd>пользование</kwd><kwd>распоряжение</kwd><kwd>гражданское право</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>state property</kwd><kwd>private property right</kwd><kwd>ownership</kwd><kwd>use</kwd><kwd>disposal</kwd><kwd>civil law</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><ref id="ref1"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">Россия в цифрах. М., 2001. С. 202.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref2"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">Экономика и жизнь. 2002. № 21. С. 3; Вопросы экономики. 2002. № 8. С. 6, 7.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref3"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">Нижегородская правда. 2000. 21 ноября. С. 2.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref4"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">Львов Д.С. Экономика развития. М., 2002. С. 12, 221.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref5"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">Аргументы и факты. 2002. № 42. С. 3.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref6"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">Бабаев А.Б. Система вещных прав: Монография. М.: Волтерс Клувер, 2006. С. 368, 369.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref7"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">Гражданское право: актуальные проблемы теории и практики / Под ред. В.А. Белова. М.: Юрайт-Издат, 2007. С. 368, 369.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref8"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">Гражданское право: актуальные проблемы теории и практики / Под общ. ред. В.А. Белова. М.: Юрайт-Издат, 2007. С. 362.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref9"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">Бабаев А.Б. Указ. соч. С. 368.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref10"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">Постановление Федерального арбитражного суда Московского округа от 24 декабря 2002 г. № КГ-А40/8466-02.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref11"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Russia in numbers. M., 2001. S. 202.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref12"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Economics and life. 2002. № 21. S. 3; Economic issues. 2002. № 8. S. 6, 7.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref13"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Nizhny Novgorod truth. 2000. November 21. P. 2.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref14"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Lvov D.S. Development Economics. M., 2002. S. 12, 221.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref15"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Arguments and facts. 2002. № 42. S. 3.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref16"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Babaev A.B. System of property rights: Monograph. M.: Wolters Kluver, 2006. PP. 368, 369.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref17"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Civil law: actual problems of theory and practice/Ed. V.A. Belova. M.: Yurayt-Izdat, 2007. PP. 368, 369.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref18"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Civil law: actual problems of theory and practice/Under the general. ed. V.A. Belova. M.: Yurayt-Izdat, 2007. P. 362.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref19"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Babaev A.B. Decree. Op. P. 368.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref20"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Resolution of the Federal Arbitration Court of the Moscow District No. KG-A40/8466-02 dated December 24, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
